Please sign the petition at https://www.change.org/p/california-state-house-recall-judge-aaron-persky

There  are now over a million signatures on this petition which involved a slap on the wrist prison sentence for a well to do Stanford athlete and his family, when the state was asking for 6 to 8.

He should have received 8 to 10.  Why the lax request from the state’s attorneys offices? And the horrific miscarriage of justice by this judge?

Was it because Stanford athletes have multi million dollar programs and this lady was just a poor working class kulak?

Was it because there is a tacit agreement to give Standford rapists a slap on the wrist?

98% of rapes are not even reported, primarily due to conduct like this from the courts, and many women don’t get the press this woman got.

The entire case demands a full investigation.  I want to see all of the other rape penalites handed down…

American Judicial System for Sale: Bribes and Corruption now the Norm

Health Impact News Editor Comments

Since Health Impact News started reporting on medical kidnappings taking place in the United States, we have briefly touched upon the topic of corrupt judges and the courts that allow this to happen. See:

Medical Kidnapping Business: Judges Skirting the Law for Federal Funds

Retired Arizona Judge Reveals Corruption in Legal System

Who is Trying to Silence Filmmaker and Judicial Watchdog Bill Windsor, Currently Held in County Jail?

I recently was privileged to have a conversation with one of the top American legal minds of our day and age, Dr. Richard I. Fine, who lost his career and was unjustly put in prison for 18 months as a political prisoner. He was never even charged with a crime.

His story is not widely known, and it gives the public an insider perspective to the…

Now this just isn’t on person writing to the New York Times, this is their editorial Board

Read on:

Prosecutors are the most powerful players in the American criminal justice system. Their decisions — like whom to charge with a crime, and what sentence to seek — have profound consequences.

So why is it so hard to keep them from breaking the law or violating the Constitution?

The short answer is that they are almost never held accountable for misconduct, even when it results in wrongful convictions. It is time for a new approach to ending this behavior: federal oversight of prosecutors’ offices that repeatedly ignore defendants’ legal and constitutional rights. There is a successful model for this in the Justice Department’s monitoring of police departments with histories of misconduct.

Among the most serious prosecutorial violations is the withholding of evidence that could help a defendant prove his or her…

John Bystrom has been very active in uncovering fraud and corruption in Rockford–the type of news mega media just won’t print, but everyone in town knows it is going on and on and on. The state’s attorneys won’t touch it, the FBI in Rockford won’t touch it, but John Bystrom has been investigating and publishing and now has his own blog–a blog for sure you won’t want to miss.

Antipsychotic drugs are riskier for older dementia patients than previously thought, study finds

U.S. Government Accountability Office

Physicians often prescribe antipsychotic drugs to older people with dementia to control non-memory related behavioral symptoms, including agitation, aggressiveness, delusions and hallucinations.

But officials at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have never approved antipsychotic medications — such as haloperidol (Haldol), risperidone (Risperdal),olanzapine (Zyprexa) and quetiapine (Seroquel) — for that purpose. Indeed, these medicines come with a “black box” FDA warning that their use to control behavioral disturbances in people with dementia is associated with an increased risk of premature death.

Many physicians have continued to prescribe the drugs to their patients with dementia anyway, believing that the benefits — primarily protecting patients from harming themselves or others — outweigh the risks.

A study published Wednesday in the journalJAMA Psychiatry, however, presents troubling new…

And all the other  lawyers involved in running a trial with unlicensed court reporters for SIX DAYS!–Opryszek, Smart, Sang Yul Lee and Ziad Alnaqib–all involved.  The Review Board should also be required to resign for not letting my court reporter set up also. Why was she told not to set up?  It’s a violation of my due process rights.

I am now reviewing all my transcripts for unlicensed court reporters over the past few years, and with the exception of the ARDC, I can’t find a single one!

Amazing.  Only the ARDC uses unlicensed court reporters.

I want everyone to check their transcripts and give me a report on how many they find that are unlicensed.

joanne

Mr. Larkin,

The affidavit that accompanies the motion that discusses the use of unlicensed professionals by the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission creates such an appearance of impropriety that the person who wrote the affidavit as well as all who were consulted in reference thereto surrender their law licenses as severe dangers to the public.

You are aware that professional licensing is the chosen method by which the State protects consumers. Use of unlicensed people by the Attorney Disciplinary Commission (IARDC) is beyond contempt. However, it is consistent with everything that went on in my case, JoAnne Denison’s case, Lanre Amu’s case ***** and the racial insult heaped upon an Icon of the Civil Rights movement (Diane Nash). Just focusing on the JoAnne Denison case you at this point in time know that the charges made against Ms. Denison (and myself) were totally false and even had they been…

See below pleadings:

Motion for Leave to Supplement Pleadings

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwU01BT2cyRnVaSDg

Motion to Supplement Pleadings

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwclludTBhTlVjU28

Exhibits:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocweGZCXzI2eE9vTmM

Here is my Motion to Vacate:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwckJkZ3A4MXJoZHc

Now here is the ARDC response:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwWFc4YmVVcXJsYzQ

This is absolutely unbelievable.  The ARDC offers no explanation or response to why they are using unlicensed court reporters from unlicensed agencies that list corporate names on their transcripts that are either inactive, expired or non existent corporations!

They have painted themselves into a corner.  Either a license is important and a court reporter or attorney must have it, or the license is not important and a court reporter or attorney does not have to have it but they can still act as one, file affidavits as one, and even appear in court as one and pretend to be one! What is good for the goose, is good for the gander.

The ARDC has painted itself in a corner…