Amazingly, Justice Maureen Connors writes up a decision dismissing a case based upon lack of jurisdiction, but ignored service upon Mary Sykes in 09 P 4585
Johnson v. Platas, 2016 IL App (1st) 143468-U (Ill. App., 2016) see http://www.illinoiscourts.gov/r23_orders/AppellateCourt/2016/1stDistrict/1143468_R23.pdf
And how is this a “rule 23” decision that is not supposed to be cited. Now attorneys in Illinois cannot cite cases that fully support the 5th Amendment? I believe that violates the First Amendment. Rule 23 is clearly unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
View original post 99 more words