From: kenneth ditkowsky 
 
 Sent: Jun 20, 2014 6:31 AM
 
 To: DX , JoAnne Denison 
 
 Subject: Fw: http://projects.huffingtonpost.com/hospice-inc [note the article huffington posts on hospice fraud is great] The revelation that your mother was starved to death represents a very serious criminal act that was attorned to by the Courts.    If in fact that statement is a true fact, a homicide has occurred and it is a scenario that has to be addressed now as part of the Petition for your appointment as the executor.  No longer is this a matter in which 'dollars' are involved - we are talking about basic human dignity and integrity.   Taking the liberty and property of a citizen is a horrible; however, the unilateral decision to take a life is beyond horrible.     Look at this problem in a universal sense we have all the elements of a National Socialist state: 1)…

Dear Readers;

One of the main missions of this blog is to make the courts a better place for the attorneys and public.  We want free and open courts, we want to access court documents efficiently and for a reasonable cost.

Unfortunately, right now the cost is 25 to 50 cents per page or more, and you have to go to the court, click on a fairly complicated outdated system to pull up the very nice WYSIWYG system (for many people the system is fairly confounding, even the clerks who use it all the time don’t know how many zeros to put in before the court number and if you have to use P or CH or L in the middle, etc)

Pacer was implemented in 2000 in the federal courts and it is a very simple but efficient system.  Attorneys and others who sign up and pay 8 cents…

From Ken DitkowskyOn Jun 11, 2014 9:30 AM, “kenneth ditkowsky” <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com> wrote:

Ken Ditkowsky

http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com

As some time ‘elder cleansing’ is going to be prosecuted, and some lawyers are going to be targets.       I want Mr. Larkin to be deprived of the excuse that he did not know. I have that vivid memory of Larkin’s attorney walking up to me waving a letter to the Attorney General of the United States disclosing the elder cleansing and asking me if I was repentant for the outrageous act of reporting an ongoing felony.     The fact that  lawyer paid by the State of Illinois was not aware of the First Amendment and asked me if I was repentant for not engaging in the coverup of a felony gets the hair on the back of my neck to *****.

Ken Ditkowsky

Dear Readers

And I would like to remind…

This is the comment I posted on tribune.com in response to the story

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-cook-county-judge-notes-edit-0609-20140609,0,4718153.story

TO THE SUNTIMES AND TRIB REPORTERS:

You can contact me anytime about dozens of stories of corruption in Crook County anytime or read my blog at http://www.marygsykes.com

my comment:
I am a lawyer in Chicago, fighting corruption and I can tell you over a hundred stories on that issue (there is a reason it is “crook county”). but my story today is HEY, THAT WAS ME. I was told just weeks ago in court room 1804 that I could not blog with my computer. I put it away. Then I was told no note taking, I had to sit there and do nothing. This is FROM THE DEPUTIES OF COOK COUNTY. I had a fit and published on my blog. I gave the deputies a lecture impromptu on first amendment rights. What did they respond? It…

Ken did an amazing job on his Petition for Writ of Cert and let’s keep our fingers crossed.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwM2dicS1VcFJFdGc/edit?usp=sharing

The research and writing is astounding.  Our Supreme Press Associate has filed this today and is emailing the ARDC attorneys and Jerome Larkin.

I personally think that after Judge Stuart “suddenly retired” after the discrepancies in the transcript between what she said and what was transcribed (I’m certain they were all in on it–and the Tribunal has said nothing in my case either)

It is NOW TIME TO DROP MY CASE AND KEN’S CASE AND APOLOGIZE FOR THE ARDC’S APPALLING BEHAVIOR.

The writing is on the wall–“GAME OVER”.  Judges Kowamoto (remember the Alice Gore 29 gold teeth pulled story, that was her courtroom) and the no jurisdiction for 5 years Judge Stuart are now gone.  What makes the IARDC and Jerome Larkin think they are so…

https://www.facebook.com/notes/boomers-against-elder-abuse/educate-yourself-predatory-guardianships-of-the-elderly/501393469936242

Dear Readers;

As you know, a guardianship is a death sentence for any person.  You can’t get out of them.  Most docs who say a person is incompetent do it on their looks, their messy home, or they will even go and make stuff up (LV guardianship).

so take the case of Gerilyn:

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2014/05/20/trapped-in-the-system.html

This article was brought to my attention by a probate victim in Ohio, Rosanna Miller, so please continue to pray for her for comfort and healing and truth and justice in her case.

joanne

If you review the Rules of Discipline for attorneys, there is a rule that the ARDC can get up to $1,000 in costs after they win.

The only problem with Ken’s case is he did nothing wrong.  The ARDC accuses him of falsely claiming to represent Mary in a letter to Dr. Patel, but they refuse to link to the letter on their blog, because the letter says the opposite.  They then say he lied about judges, but the record in 09 P 4585 is clear the court never served Mary nor her sisters and is sans jurisdiction.  This blog publishes those claims of Mr. Ditkowsky and challenges the ARDC and miscreants to support their (bogus) claims, which they simply cannot do.  It is all a facade, a house of cards.

So then we ask ourselves, why are they doing this, and we search for health care fraud, insurance fraud…

From: kenneth ditkowsky <kenditkowsky@yahoo.com>
Sent: May 28, 2014 10:24 AM
To: “illinois.ardc@gmail.com” <illinois.ardc@gmail.com>, “IllinoisLawyerNow@isba.org” <illinoislawyernow@isba.org>, “ilsenate29@sbcglobal.net” <ilsenate29@sbcglobal.net>, “ilhouse51@sbcglobal.net” <ilhouse51@sbcglobal.net>, “ilsenate20@sbcglobal.net” <ilsenate20@sbcglobal.net>, “ildbambic@govabuse.org” <ildbambic@govabuse.org>, “illhouse@aol.com” <illhouse@aol.com>, “ilrepmikeboland@aol.com” <ilrepmikeboland@aol.com>, ISBA Main Discussion Group <isba@list.isba.org>, “IllinoisLawyerNow@isba.org” <illinoislawyernow@isba.org>, “isilverstein@senatedem.ilga.gov” <isilverstein@senatedem.ilga.gov>, GLORIA SYKES <gloami@msn.com>, probate sharks <verenusl@gmail.com>, NASGA <nasga.org@gmail.com>, “tips@elderabuseexposed.com” <tips@elderabuseexposed.com>, Tim NASGA <timlahrman@aol.com>, Cook Sheriff <sheriff.dart@cookcountyil.gov>, Chicago Tribune <tips@tribune.com>, Cook County States Attorney <statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov>, Eric Holder <askdoj@usdoj.gov>, matt senator kirk <matt_abbott@kirk.senate.gov>, Mary Richards <maryrichards45@gmail.com>, mary wooley state police <mary_woolery@isp.state.il.us>, SUNTIMES <letters@suntimes.com>, scott evans <scottcevans@hotmail.com>, Diane Nash <sa3456@msn.com>, “ACLU@ACLU.ORG” <aclu@aclu.org>, “Mr. Lanre Amu — honest atty unfairly persecuted by ARDC” <loamu@aol.com>, “acluofillinois@aclu-il.org” <acluofillinois@aclu-il.org>, “Atty Nejla Lane Lane Legal Services. com” <info@lanelegalservices.com>, JoAnne Denison <joanne@denisonlaw.com>, Janet Phelan <writejanet@live.com>, John Howard Wyman <johnhowardwyman@gmail.com>, j ditkowsky <jdit@aol.com>, Harry Heckert <vahrh1135@aol.com>, Kathie Bakken <k_bakken@att.net>, “Mr. Kim” <raywkim@yahoo.com>
Subject: Formal Complaint against Jerome Larkin, Administrator of the IARDC

After reading the Seth Gillman article in Crains and the Sun-times it…

Dear Readers;

One of the issues my trial stated out with was Atty Melissa Smart of the ARDC going on and on about how my blog is like “yelling fire in a crowded theater” which, I believe, is fairly akin to the Nelson 7th circuit case wherein 2 Aldermen in Chicago (Bobby Rush and Dorothy Tillman) entered the Art Institute of Chicago — one brandishing a gun– and claimed that a painting depicting former Mayor Harold Washington in ladies undies and a garter belt “would incite riots” in the street of Chicago, making that speech a “clear and present danger.”

So when and why is speech a “clear and present danger”.  Is there any belief amongst reasonable people out there that this blog in any means or manner could ever incite any sort of violent action, other than perhaps a paper cut? (pixels generally don’t damage anyone or anything, except…