Note below the comments that were removed.  I want every to note that none of the comments contained ANY profanity, ANY disrespectful or ridiculous comments. Everyone posted something logical, true and what should be protected by the First Amendment.

Now I predicted that Jerome Larkin of the ARDC would call up someone at the ABA and tell them you had better not publish anything that supports Ms. Denison, Mr. Ditkowsky, Mr. Amu and for sure do NOT let the family post anything that they were treated by the Tribunal in a disrespectful manner, ignored and further abused.

I WAS RIGHT–SHAMEFULLY RIGHT.

But here’s what I did.  I SAVED THE COMMENTS ON SUNDAY NIGHT so we still have them.  Yup that’s right.  And guess what, now that the 7th circuit has said in MY decision that it was okay for the ARDC and their puppet goons Nextpoint to copy and republish…

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Dec 7, 2014 12:11 AM
To: “JoAnne M. Denison” , Probate Sharks , Tim NASGA , Nasga Us , “J. Ditkowsky” , Eric Holder , Matt Senator Kirk , Chicago FBI , “FBI- ( (” , BILL DITKOWSKY , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , Janet Phelan , Ginny Johnson , “ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT)” , Cook County States Attorney , Barbara Stone , FOX News Network LLC , Illinois ARDC , Diane Nash , Scott Evans , Bev Cooper , Fiduciary Watch , Edward Carter , ISBA Main Discussion Group , Cook Sheriff , “wsj.lts@wsj.com” , William Scott <04wmscott@comcast.net>, Alyece Russell , Eric Blair , ACLU of Illinois , Attorney Mark Adams , Attorney Dr Richard Fine , “ABAJournal.com” , Jay Goldman , Candice Schwager , The Disability Discussion Docket – Official E-mail List of the Commission On Disability Right <3d@mail.americanbar.org>, “tips@cbschicago.com” , Glenda Martinez , “Mr…

See below and thanks for Dr. Sam Sugar for doing this.

I wonder if estate planning documents work too.

Dear friends

http://journal-neo.org/2014/11/29/assisted-suicide-a-slippery-slope-to-eugenics/

raises a whole lot of hair raising questions.  As we have all seen from this blog, elders have a (financial) value to many guardians and court connected personnel.  At first, they are targeted with false financial surveys at hospitals, nursing homes, senior centers, “visiting nurses”–any forum to find a target and you will often find a nursing home, hospital, probate court connected attorney or GAL behind it, plus the litany of “professional” leeches and parasites.  (Anti) social workers that bills but never show up (LVL case), case (mis) managers that do the same, fake reports of “agitation” of a ward requiring supervised visitation at $100+ an hour from a $10/hour employee that is glued to a cell phone the entire time, tweeting, emailing or whatever.

But when the money runs out, watch out.  That means the ultimate demise or assisted involuntary suicide for the elder.  The nursing homes and…

In re Lorraine Phillips.

Words cannot describe. While I go to court to beg for a few more dollars for Mom and a 24/7 caretaker son who are living below the poverty level (yes, the judge even looked it up right on her desk) Atty David Martin and his client are arguing that these two should not get another dime.

Estate bank account–$143k.  Income is now $25k per month, with $15k per month in expenses for a valuable piece of property in downtown Chicago.

Today the son told the court he qualified for food stamps.  Then we all asked him to decrease his monthly allotment from social security (he is under age 65) to get social security for him and his mother.

Judge wouldn’t budge one dime.  The GAL said he agreed an increase was in order, but he didn’t know how much an upcoming balloon payment on the loan…

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Dec 1, 2014 8:37 PM
To: “JoAnne M. Denison” , Sylvia Rudek
Cc: “wsj.lts@wsj.com” , William Scott <04wmscott@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Motion for Rehearing? Notice of Appeal?

http://www.chicagolawbulletin.com/Articles/2014/12/01/Judge-Reassigned-12-1-14.aspx

This interesting article describes how on Judge, Judge Chevres, has jailed 44 courtroom members of the public in a relatively short time—far outnumbering her peers.  8 men were jailed on “direct contempt” for having pants worn too low!

We all know that Gloria Sykes was handcuffed when court connected attorneys wanted to grab her money and got Judge Stuart to do it–direct criminal contempt, when far better measures could be used first (fines, seizure of other property such as her car, cell phone, whatever) but it absolutely abhorred to arrest and hold a member of the public–not a litigant in the case, to chain them to a table in the ante room of the judge.  It is even far worse to have your deputies then threaten to gather up your pets and have them euthanized at the City Pound!  Such news was shocking to me, and I wondered how…

First, from the ACLU group of Linked In, we have this “can a Facebook public post be a criminal threat” –

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/supreme-court-case-tests-the-limits-of-free-speech-on-facebook-and-other-social-media/2014/11/23/9e54dbd8-6f67-11e4-ad12-3734c461eab6_story.html

which is to be reviewed shortly by the US supreme court.

The quote clearly does not fall under “First Amendment” rights, or does it?

What did the guy say to his soon to be ex?

“Fold up your PFA [protection-from-abuse order] and put it in your pocket

Is it thick enough to stop a bullet?”

What was his excuse?  RAP music.  He likes RAP music and was emulating his heroes.

And more from the washshington post on highway robberies by police officers.  The upshot?  Use a debit card.  Do NOT carry or accept cash for payments.  Do NOT keep anything of value in your car.  All sorts of cell phones, laptops, cash and other valuables have been taken by police by simply writing down on reports “drug trafficking…