From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Apr 16, 2014 4:29 PM
To: Eric Holder , Cook County States Attorney , Cook Sheriff , Edward Carter , Jo Anne M Denison
Cc: Tim NASGA , Diane Nash , NASGA , probate sharks , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , j ditkowsky , Harry Heckert , matt senator kirk
Subject: Wholesale violations of the Americans with Disability Act on the 18th Floor of the Daley Center/and in the Probate Courts in general.

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Apr 15, 2014 6:00 AM
To: Marty Prehn , JoAnne Denison , Janet Phelan , NASGA , probate sharks , Eric Holder , Harry Heckert , j ditkowsky , Tim NASGA , Chicago Tribune , SUNTIMES , “foxnews_7D7B711AF105DCA690AB56169C0FF242@newsletters.foxnews.com” , Cook County States Attorney , Edward Carter , mary wooley state police , Mary Richards , jim , scott evans , mary wooley state police , matt senator kirk
Subject: Re: Respect for the ADA–Americans with Disabilities Act

Dear Readers;

One of the things that happens only in ARDC litigation is that if you’re an attorney defending your constitutional rights, and you assert those rights, first thing they do is Strike your pleading.  I think I have a stack of their “Motions to Strike”.  Now this is funny, they moved to strike the depositions of the key crucial fact witnesses: Gloria Sykes, Scott Evans, Yolanda and Kathie Bakken, but then they use them at trial!

I have never seen a proceeding with so many Motions to Strike. Most of the time, opposing counsel files a Response and a decision is made on the merits.  Motions to Strike are supposed to only be used in rare occassions.

Here is the ARDC Motion to Strike:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwTGQ1dWJFUGlQUVE/edit?usp=sharing

Here is my response:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwcFJSNUhPZVNJbEU/edit?usp=sharing

Make sure you read my declaration at the end of my response.  It’s an eye opener.  As you will…

Hi!


The program will be on at this URL .  Please try listening in 10-15 
minutes.  The instructions for Ken are very very confusing....

http://ppjg.me/

From: GLORIA Jean SYKES <gloami@msn.com>
Sent: Apr 7, 2014 8:33 PM
To: JoAnne M Denison <joanne@justice4every1.com>
Cc: “k_bakken@att.net” <k_bakken@att.net>
Subject: RE: Help me spread the word: stop guardianship abuse

From: Gloria Jean Sykes
Sent: Apr 7, 2014 6:26 PM
To: jdenison@surfree.com
Subject: Help me spread the word: stop guardianship abuse

Dear Family, Friends, Colleagues, and Supporters,

Thank you for signing my petition. With your help, we’ve already reached people who care deeply about this issue. But if we are going to have an impact, it’s critical that we get at least 150 signatures before we deliver the petition to the political elite and law enforcement.  Obviously the more people who sign, the greater impact and a quicker resolve.  My Mother is still alive, although suffering greatly while hostage in the home of a named abuser.  And I am certain as I write there are thousands of other elderly and disabled people ‘still alive’ but suffering because of court sanctioned abuses and financial exploitation.  You can help prosecute more attorneys who are part of the Cottage Industry sanctioned by our…

Dear Ken;

You are absolutely right, a 4 year suspension for speaking the truth is nothing but vindictive retaliation for tattling on the nefarious activities of favored attorneys and judges on the 18th floor.

And they still want to shut down my blog.  My blog is now officially MISCONDUCT.  I will publish the order on Monday.  My blog is the only one, it’s popular and people have come to trust and support it–50,000+ views in 2 years and all the ARDC wants to do is shut it down. I get new subscribers every week.  It’s nothing but a ridiculous “blame the media” action for the conduct of the favored ones.

From Disraeli:

“London owes everything to its press: it owes as much to its press as it does to its being the seat of government and the law.  The press is not only free, it is powerful. That power is…

From a concerned family member (I won’t say whose family)

1)  What could/should the legislature to to put an end to unwanted/unnecessary guardianships?

2) What should we specifically be asking of our congress people?

3) What is the normal procedure for reporting illegal activity or elder abuse?

4) What could be done so that existing agencies have some teeth and can take action?

5) What is the proper form of redress re: a. siblings not being served, b. children and siblings not served, c. improper adjudication?