I have not talked to Barbara Stone in a long time.  The last time I talked to her was to say good bye because “those who are in charge” threatened her that if she continued to speak out against the abusive guardianship of her mother, her mother would end up dead.

I know there are many of you out there that have heard the threat, that is sad and it disgusts me.

I know Barbara.  I have seen her in action. She is smart, a great attorney and helps everyone who comes to her.  I watched her spend hours on the phone trying to help others.

But the Racket in Miami Dade is well entrenched and very, very evil.

I have seen the corrupt court system with states attorneys that run to the judge’s office to talk about the case.

I have seen how Barbara was treated with disgust.

I…

Injustice Watch- 

Oregon Senate Passes Bill to Allow Starving Mentally Ill Patients to Death

Only a psychopath would allow for such a thing.  But from what I hear from victims and their families of elder cleansing, their elderly loved ones are being forced into nursing homes and even a casual visitor will hear the patients say they want to go home (why is no one investigating this) or they are hungry because they aren’t fed enough or need help in feeding but aren’t getting it.

At Warren Barr, I am told that unless the Daughter came daily to feed her mother, Mother would not get fed.  And on some days when Daughter was 15 min. late, a full tray was put back on the cart to get shipped to the kitchen.  Why?  trays are plunked down in front of the patient, and if the patient does not eat in 15 min and…

This woman asks some very interesting questions. Sooo much money blown up and squandered.  Why can’t we now travel to these countries?

Reposted with permission

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oWiE6KSns4o1oR6Bg4MV7YHaNcMWZLWFECf6MQoS5SM/edit

State Of Indiana Forced To Pay $25 MILLION To Couple After Making Their Lives A Living Hell

BySteven H Ahle

Posted onJune 2, 2017

Either watch this 7 part series on Netflix, or get to a friend’s home and watch it.

Back in 1969, a nun and a 19 year old woman were brutally murdered and their bodies dumped in a sleeping surburban town that saw little or no crime.

Keough was the Catholic School where hundreds of teen girls were abused by 2 Priests and their friends and buddies–with the girls suffering brutal repeated rapes.

One priest was raping boys at another school, the mother found out and demanded the school do something and they did, they transferred the priest to Keough!

Why do I recommend the movie?  The case received unprecedented attention, a massive “investigation” was undertaken, thousands of documents recovered, scores of people interviewed, the state, local and county governments collected information and documents and even the FBI (the murders occurred on military installations for training soldiers so the FBI had…

Holding:  the Sheriff got off, but the Mortgagee was liable for notice and due process to the tenants when a Writ of Assistance issued from the Circuit Court

760 F. Supp. 1288

William SCOTT and Rosemary Scott, Plaintiffs,
v.
James E. O’GRADY, Sheriff of Cook County, et al., Defendants.

No. 90 C 5810.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

February 26, 1991.

[760 F. Supp. 1289]

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

[760 F. Supp. 1290]

Lewis Check, Loyola University Community Law Center, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Douglas B. Swill, Asst. State’s Atty., Chicago, Ill., for defendants Sheriff O’Grady and Deputy Sheriff Branch.

David Letvin, Letvin and Stein, Chicago, Ill., for defendant Diamond Mortg. Corp.

[760 F. Supp. 1291]

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CONLON, District Judge.

In this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiffs William and Rosemary Scott (“the Scotts”) sue Cook County Sheriff James O’Grady; Deputy Sheriff Kelvin…

Hardick v. Vreeken  https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/01/03/15-55563.pdf

Some great excerpts from this case:

The panel affirmed the district court’s denial, on summary judgment, of absolute and qualified immunity to social workers who plaintiff alleged maliciously used perjured testimony and fabricated evidence to secure plaintiff’s removal from her mother, and that this abuse of state power violated her Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment constitutional rights to her familial relationship with her mother. The panel held that the social workers were not entitled to absolute immunity from claims that they maliciously used perjured testimony and fabricated evidence to secure plaintiff’s removal. The panel held that plaintiff’s complaint targeted conduct well outside of the social workers’ legitimate role as quasi-prosecutorial advocates in presenting the case. The panel held that defendants’ case for qualified immunity was not supported by the law or the record. The panel determined that plaintiff produced more than sufficient admissible evidence to create a…