I received an e-mail that I responded to with my comments in red. I am forwarding the words and phrases as the problem is brought forward in a very straight forward manner, to wit:
On Thursday, March 8, 2018, 11:21:28 AM CST, MARK TOMEY SR. <mstomey@hotmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Ditkowsky: some legal passages concerning “void judgements”
a.) “Any judge who does not comply with his oath of office to the Constitution
of the United States, wars against the Constitution and engages in violation of the
Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then
his orders are void. In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and
he/ she has engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101
S. Ct. 471, 66 EEd. 2d…
View original post 6,444 more words