From KKD: Void Judgments, Larkin perfidy, etc.

I received an e-mail that I responded to with my comments in red.    I am forwarding the words and phrases as the problem is brought forward in a very straight forward manner, to wit:
On Thursday, March 8, 2018, 11:21:28 AM CST, MARK TOMEY SR. <> wrote:
Mr. Ditkowsky: some legal passages concerning “void judgements”
          a.) “Any judge who does not comply with his oath of office to the Constitution 

of the United States, wars against the Constitution and engages in violation of the 

Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then

his orders are void. In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and 

he/ she has engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 

S. Ct. 471, 66 EEd. 2d…

View original post 6,444 more words

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s