To: JoAnne M Denison <JoAnne@justice4every1.com>, and 30 others….
Subject: Re: ARDC v. JMD demand for fee payment for using unlicensed court reporters
Date: Jul 19, 2016 6:24 AM
It is not often that any public body is so blatant as to intentionally misrepresent the holdings of the SCOTUS, or make statements comparing the disclosure of judicial corruption as being akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater. It is common for dishonest regulators to misrepresent disclosures by calling them untrue; however, Mr. Larkin and the IARDC have reached new lows that even most dishonest political and judicial miscreants would avoid.
As an example, calling the blog’s disclosures of the corruption by dishonest judges untrue statements when the IARDC took a deposition of Judge Connors and in the judge admitted on page 91 her being wired takes a particular form of dishonesty. Subordinating the perjury…
View original post 246 more words