During the end of my hearing, SO pointed out the following

1) the table of torts was wrong to mention PS as a trouble-feasor (can’t say tort feasor), but put nothing in the verbiage, so I corrected that.  See item 9. (Usu. I correct after getting an email complaint, NOT after someone complains in court, so I’m reminding people if you want a correction, please EMAIL me or just post a comment.  It doesn’t help me much to mention it in court.  I’m an email person.)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6FbJzwtHocwZlhsbXU2bTFqN0k/edit?usp=sharing

2) Apparently the IARDC and the Tribunal doesn’t like the tag “corruption” either, so I’m replacing all the “corruption” tags with “not corruption”, as if that matters.  A search engine listing just directs someone to click on and read an article. If they feel better that the tag is “not corruption”, unlike those powers that be, I know my readers are smart and can…