From Ken Ditkowsky–his summary of the (alleged) schemes and frauds of Jerome Larkin

Joanne M Denison's avatarMaryGSykes.com

From: kenneth ditkowsky
Sent: Dec 1, 2014 8:37 PM
To: “JoAnne M. Denison” , Sylvia Rudek
Cc: “wsj.lts@wsj.com” , William Scott <04wmscott@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Motion for Rehearing? Notice of Appeal?

The IARDC has set up a procedure that is intended to provide the appearance of ‘due process.’   After the hearing board renders its pre-determined decision, then there is a procedure for a Review board.   Any motion for rehearing etc is usually summarily denied.

There is a distinction in your case that if Larkin has any brain should operate.   His scheme has now been exposed and he is running in the face of an additional statute, to wit:47 USCA 230.    In addition Tim has pointed out 42 USCA 12203 is also applicable. As once again Larkin cannot point to a single statement made by either you or me that he has presented a scintilla evidence concerning.  …

View original post 301 more words

Leave a comment