From: timlahrman@aol.com
Sent: Feb 6, 2014 11:56 AM
To: kenditkowsky@yahoo.com, gloami@msn.com, JoAnne@justice4every1.com
Cc: NASGA.org@gmail.com, verenusl@gmail.com, statesattorney@cookcountyil.gov, askdoj@usdoj.gov, illinois.ardc@gmail.com, ACLU@ACLU.ORG
Subject: Re: let me suggest: if there are any Judges that think the elder cleansing cases are violating the principle stated in this case
in the administration and supervision of a guardianship, the judge is performing a ministerial duty and function — supervising the judges own agent.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12487436578707268804&q=Gross&hl=en&as_sdt=4,107,122 (2nd Cir 2012)
may I also suggest that judges are not free to expand the defined class of persons intended to be served by the guardianship statutes, and do so by judicial fiat — but it is being done all the time by these judges that believe simply being old is good enough reason to appoint a guardian.
one last thing I want to point out here — the civil practice of law —-…
View original post 209 more words
Justice for Everyone Blog 