Thanks Tim.

From: “timlahrman@aol.com” <timlahrman@aol.com>
To: kenditkowsky@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 8:33 PM
Subject: well worth passing around —

305 F.3d 660 (2002)

A.D. BROKAW, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Karen WEAVER, Mercer County, State of Illinois, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14218329132479969725&q=A.D.+Brokaw+&hl=en&as_sdt=4,112,127,268,269,270,271,272,314,

315,331,332,333,334,335,377,378

In support of her position, A.D. cites Nesses, 68 F.3d 1003. In that case, Nesses brought suit in federal court against the lawyers and some of the judges involved in a breach of contract case which he had filed in Indiana state court and lost. Id. at 1004. Nesses claimed that his opponents’ lawyers used their political clout to turn the state judges against him. Id. The district court dismissed Nesses’ suit for lack of jurisdiction based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Id. This court rejected that conclusion, reasoning that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine did not bar Nesses’ claim because his suit was not premised on a claim that the